Last couple thoughts about reading
Committed...- She talks about the role of childless women in the raising of children and families, calling them the "Auntie Brigade." I love this title! I had my own Aunties in my life, and I'm super grateful for them. Among other anecdotes, she shared:
"And have you ever wondered what Peter Pan really looked like? His creator, J.M. Barrie, answered that question for us back in 1911. For Barrie, Peter Pan's image and his essence and his marvelous spirit of felicity can be found all over the world, hazily reflected 'in the faces of many women who have no children.' That is the Auntie Brigade."
I must say I like being a part of the Auntie Brigade, at least for now.
Gilbert also talks about trading stories with her fiance. She talks about it coming from Italo Calvino's Invisible Cities, where the author talks about merchants gathering at every solstice and equinox to exchange goods, including stories. She says:
"This is what intimacy does to us over time. That's what marriage can do: It causes us to inherit and trade each other's stories. This, in part, is how we become annexes of each other, trellises on which each other's biography can grow."
Later, she talks about one night when both she and Felipe were awake and she "once more" selected a word at random and requested, "Please tell me a story about fish." I thought this was an interesting way to go about learning someone's stories. Choosing a word and having the other person tell a story about that word.
The last thing that particularly struck me (at least that I need the book to remember). The following few sentences:
"'MARRIAGE IS NOT PRAYER!' he [Gilbert's friend] insisted (italics and capitals his). 'That's why you have to do it in front of others, even in front of your aunt who smells like cat litter. It's a paradox, but marriage actually reconciles a lot of paradoxes: freedom with commitment, strength with subordination, wisdom with utter nincompoopery, etc. And you're missing the main point - it's not just to "satisfy" other people. Rather, you have to hold your wedding guests to their end of the deal. They have to help you with your marriage; they have to support you or Felipe, if one of you falters.'"
Obviously, she was talking about her not wanting or understanding the need for a public wedding ceremony. She and Felipe had a private ceremony just the two of them, and didn't want a public wedding. I liked the way her friend talked about marriage reconciling paradoxes, and not being a prayer but a public thing. In fact, I would argue that marriage is both a public and a private thing. We interact with the world as a married couple, but at the same time our marriage is one of the most private things in our lives. I also liked the idea of the wedding guests not only witnessing a marriage beginning but also helping in the process later on, and that being a reason to invite people to your wedding. Choosing the people you want to support you in your marriage, including your biological family as you are combining two families, not just uniting two people.
That's all the thoughts that I'll share with you for now folks. Of course, for those of you who know me will realize, there were many, many other memories and thoughts that came to mind. But I want the chance for other people, and probably my future self, to have new reactions and to keep some thoughts close to only my heart.